<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ojo Gringo: A Pulse on Latin America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ojogringo.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ojogringo.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The Hugo Chavez Show by Betsy Young</title>
		<link>http://ojogringo.com/archives/38#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Betsy Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojogringo.com/?p=38#comment-131</guid>
		<description>Betsy Young 

I have watched a full sneak preview of this program. I feel the program provides a bleak and unrealistic view of President Chavez and his administration by focusing almost exclusively on negative themes and stories. 

The most egregious mistakes are outlined below and merit a response. 

1. Frontline states that President Chavez resigned during the 2002, which is not true. The Venezuelan leader did not renounce his presidency, although he was held captive and threatened with a bombing of the presidential palace.

2. Frontline completely ignores the well known manipulation of the events of the 2002 coup by Venezuela’s private media, as well as its role in staging the coup.

3. Frontline asserts that Chavez used the enabling law to pass 12 laws that did not pass in a referendum on constitutional reforms. However, the 26 laws decreed on the last day of the enabling law are fundamentally different from those that faced referendum last December. All of them are in accordance with the constitution.

4. Frontline irresponsibly closes the program with the following quote: “Chavez barred hundreds of opposition candidates from running [in regional elections].” Again, PBS gets it wrong as this law was not written nor approved by Chavez. It was made in the National Assembly in 2001 by opposition and government supporters alike, including the former political party of opposition Mayor Leopoldo López, Primero Justicia. The law enables administrative sanctions for a variety of corruption charges and allows politicians to finish their term in office. 

I am extremely disappointed in Frontline’s shoddy journalism here. Fact checking should be a requirement not an option. The Chavez administration is a DEMOCRATIC administration that the Venezuelan people voted for DEMOCRATICALLY, not matter how this show and other media outlets try to mislead us for the purposes of big business that are upset that they can no longer exploit the resources of Venezuela for their own profits. After 8+ years, there is a much higher approval rating of Chavez by the Venezuelan people than we Americans have for Bush - that should say more than any random right-wing Venezuelan or American may say about the amazing DEMOCRATIC revolution that is happening in Venezuelan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Betsy Young </p>
<p>I have watched a full sneak preview of this program. I feel the program provides a bleak and unrealistic view of President Chavez and his administration by focusing almost exclusively on negative themes and stories. </p>
<p>The most egregious mistakes are outlined below and merit a response. </p>
<p>1. Frontline states that President Chavez resigned during the 2002, which is not true. The Venezuelan leader did not renounce his presidency, although he was held captive and threatened with a bombing of the presidential palace.</p>
<p>2. Frontline completely ignores the well known manipulation of the events of the 2002 coup by Venezuela’s private media, as well as its role in staging the coup.</p>
<p>3. Frontline asserts that Chavez used the enabling law to pass 12 laws that did not pass in a referendum on constitutional reforms. However, the 26 laws decreed on the last day of the enabling law are fundamentally different from those that faced referendum last December. All of them are in accordance with the constitution.</p>
<p>4. Frontline irresponsibly closes the program with the following quote: “Chavez barred hundreds of opposition candidates from running [in regional elections].” Again, PBS gets it wrong as this law was not written nor approved by Chavez. It was made in the National Assembly in 2001 by opposition and government supporters alike, including the former political party of opposition Mayor Leopoldo López, Primero Justicia. The law enables administrative sanctions for a variety of corruption charges and allows politicians to finish their term in office. </p>
<p>I am extremely disappointed in Frontline’s shoddy journalism here. Fact checking should be a requirement not an option. The Chavez administration is a DEMOCRATIC administration that the Venezuelan people voted for DEMOCRATICALLY, not matter how this show and other media outlets try to mislead us for the purposes of big business that are upset that they can no longer exploit the resources of Venezuela for their own profits. After 8+ years, there is a much higher approval rating of Chavez by the Venezuelan people than we Americans have for Bush - that should say more than any random right-wing Venezuelan or American may say about the amazing DEMOCRATIC revolution that is happening in Venezuelan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to rig Venezuelan elections for dummies by Ojo Gringo: A Pulse on Latin America &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Hugo Chavez Show</title>
		<link>http://ojogringo.com/archives/13#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Ojo Gringo: A Pulse on Latin America &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Hugo Chavez Show</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 06:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojogringo.com/?p=13#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] in the wake of this critical political juncture for Venezuela. Although Chavez has been able to eliminate a swath of his key rivals, this regional election threatens his projection in pivotal sectors of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the wake of this critical political juncture for Venezuela. Although Chavez has been able to eliminate a swath of his key rivals, this regional election threatens his projection in pivotal sectors of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Plan Colombia &#8212; shock and&#8230;flaw? by Sid Sheldon</title>
		<link>http://ojogringo.com/archives/14#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Sheldon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojogringo.com/?p=14#comment-107</guid>
		<description>While the rules of counterinsurgency are often inextricably Machiavellian and draw strange bedfellows, in the context of the contemporary parapoltical scandal, it is evident enough that eliminating one public enemy can give rise to the next. Nowhere is this as financially practical than in Colombia, given its illicit profits from narcotics.

Nice.  Bottomline is that equating drug trafficing to terrorists actions is a misnomer.  This administration--this country--really doesn't care about the war on drugs. They care about maintaining power.  Afterall, drugs allows for the government to imprison "undesirables", especilly those who used crack for longer periods of time.  Arbritary I think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the rules of counterinsurgency are often inextricably Machiavellian and draw strange bedfellows, in the context of the contemporary parapoltical scandal, it is evident enough that eliminating one public enemy can give rise to the next. Nowhere is this as financially practical than in Colombia, given its illicit profits from narcotics.</p>
<p>Nice.  Bottomline is that equating drug trafficing to terrorists actions is a misnomer.  This administration&#8211;this country&#8211;really doesn&#8217;t care about the war on drugs. They care about maintaining power.  Afterall, drugs allows for the government to imprison &#8220;undesirables&#8221;, especilly those who used crack for longer periods of time.  Arbritary I think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A pulse on Latin America by Vicky</title>
		<link>http://ojogringo.com/archives/1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojogringo.com/?p=1#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Blainchuss. nice articule! im happy you wrote something about my country! 
felicitaciones por todo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blainchuss. nice articule! im happy you wrote something about my country!<br />
felicitaciones por todo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A pulse on Latin America by Jose Bedoya</title>
		<link>http://ojogringo.com/archives/1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Bedoya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojogringo.com/?p=1#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Hermano que orgullo... te felicito y cuenta con mi apoyo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hermano que orgullo&#8230; te felicito y cuenta con mi apoyo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How the ‘Bogotazo’ was felt — 60 years past by Global Voices Online &#187; Colombia: 60th Anniversary of the Murder of Jorge Eliécer Gaitán</title>
		<link>http://ojogringo.com/archives/6#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online &#187; Colombia: 60th Anniversary of the Murder of Jorge Eliécer Gaitán</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojogringo.com/?p=6#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Blaine Sheldon at Ojo gringo remarks about the Semana magazine website&#8217;s multimedia special on El Bogotazo, and leaves his [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blaine Sheldon at Ojo gringo remarks about the Semana magazine website&#8217;s multimedia special on El Bogotazo, and leaves his [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How the ‘Bogotazo’ was felt — 60 years past by equinoXio english edition &#187; &#187; The blogosphere on Jorge Eliécer Gaitán&#8217;s murder 60th anniversary</title>
		<link>http://ojogringo.com/archives/6#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>equinoXio english edition &#187; &#187; The blogosphere on Jorge Eliécer Gaitán&#8217;s murder 60th anniversary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 04:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ojogringo.com/?p=6#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Blaine Sheldon at Ojo gringo remarks Semana magazine website&#8217;s multimedia special on El Bogotazo, and leaves his two [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blaine Sheldon at Ojo gringo remarks Semana magazine website&#8217;s multimedia special on El Bogotazo, and leaves his two [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
